<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dell Pulls the Trigger&#8211;and Shoots Itself in the Foot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/dell-pulls-the-trigger-and-shoots-itself-in-the-foot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/dell-pulls-the-trigger-and-shoots-itself-in-the-foot/</link>
	<description>We Stress Test Your Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/dell-pulls-the-trigger-and-shoots-itself-in-the-foot/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/?p=848#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>I agree with your assessment, although my reasons are slightly different.  First, I think the &quot;appeal&quot; of consulting margin to a predominantly commodity product company such as Dell is unavoidable.  Second, Dell appears to be falling in love with healthcare (note their recent announcement about creating an EMR capabilitiy - for which they have zero competence - but Perot does), which could - underscore could - explain their affection for Perot in particular because of Perot&#039;s healthcare forcus.
I look at HP&#039;s acquisition of EDS and don&#039;t see any material contribution to HPs financials thorugh efficiency or other tangible contribution  - other than the incremental revenue they brought - but HP seems to be bringing EDS down to their level of &quot;consulting incompetence&quot; instead of the other way around.  You put product people in charge of consultants and it invokes the camel metaphor...or the horse designed by a committee.  The price premium will simply make the impact worse.  I am glad I am not a Dell shareholder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your assessment, although my reasons are slightly different.  First, I think the &#8220;appeal&#8221; of consulting margin to a predominantly commodity product company such as Dell is unavoidable.  Second, Dell appears to be falling in love with healthcare (note their recent announcement about creating an EMR capabilitiy &#8211; for which they have zero competence &#8211; but Perot does), which could &#8211; underscore could &#8211; explain their affection for Perot in particular because of Perot&#8217;s healthcare forcus.<br />
I look at HP&#8217;s acquisition of EDS and don&#8217;t see any material contribution to HPs financials thorugh efficiency or other tangible contribution  &#8211; other than the incremental revenue they brought &#8211; but HP seems to be bringing EDS down to their level of &#8220;consulting incompetence&#8221; instead of the other way around.  You put product people in charge of consultants and it invokes the camel metaphor&#8230;or the horse designed by a committee.  The price premium will simply make the impact worse.  I am glad I am not a Dell shareholder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

