<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, No, Nokia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/no-no-nokia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/no-no-nokia/</link>
	<description>We Stress Test Your Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Vucsko</title>
		<link>http://www.devilsadvocategroup.com/no-no-nokia/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Vucsko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billiondollarlessons.com/?p=324#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Chunka,

Yes, this is a clear adjacency move. Whether or not it’s misguided is yet to be seen.

Kai Oistamo, the head of Nokia&#039;s devices business, said &quot;We are in the business of connecting people and the Nokia Booklet 3G is a natural evolution for us.&quot;

I agree with this, and I can see why a project like this would be hard to kill at the head office. But the point you made was critical; what is their product offering that others aren&#039;t? Right now, it seems like very little.

If they expect the mere fact that they are offering a netbook to be the thing that makes it successful, then I agree that it will flop.

Instead, their “open eyes” need to be open minds. They need to be flexible with the way this product is marketed. And frankly, I believe marketing is the make-or-break factor for this product. If they can leverage Nokia’s brand equities and promotional tools in the right way, this move might stand a chance.

It also wouldn’t hurt if they had some product synergies that made owning both a Nokia phone and a Nokia netbook beneficial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chunka,</p>
<p>Yes, this is a clear adjacency move. Whether or not it’s misguided is yet to be seen.</p>
<p>Kai Oistamo, the head of Nokia&#8217;s devices business, said &#8220;We are in the business of connecting people and the Nokia Booklet 3G is a natural evolution for us.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with this, and I can see why a project like this would be hard to kill at the head office. But the point you made was critical; what is their product offering that others aren&#8217;t? Right now, it seems like very little.</p>
<p>If they expect the mere fact that they are offering a netbook to be the thing that makes it successful, then I agree that it will flop.</p>
<p>Instead, their “open eyes” need to be open minds. They need to be flexible with the way this product is marketed. And frankly, I believe marketing is the make-or-break factor for this product. If they can leverage Nokia’s brand equities and promotional tools in the right way, this move might stand a chance.</p>
<p>It also wouldn’t hurt if they had some product synergies that made owning both a Nokia phone and a Nokia netbook beneficial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

